Luciano Bello
Luciano Bello
Please, refer to this issue as CVE-2016-9113
I'll take this one
> the only thing missing I think is adding it to the fake provider so that the tests will pick it up done in ca4d8271bd2e6985c326a1a947d1d6029d5082aa . thanks!
> Looks great! The only thing I want to comment is the ordering. Shouldn't Geneva go before Guadalupe? Thanks! Fixed in 6cf67f5c2384d112422ee13075f89b7f9d4075a3
good catch. I will update `update_fake_backends.py` to warning about it.
> Before accepting these kind of PRs, one should check that the snapshot is actually a good one. Here some of the 2Q gates have errors of 1, eg.: Like...
awesome! thanks for the tip @nonhermitian Updating this PR with the calibration from `2022-06-24 23:00:30+02:00` ``` ibm_geneva ========== Gate errors == 1: * cx 20, 19 * cx 16, 14...
This one should be done too @mtreinish
> Just a general question, do you think we still want/need v1 and v2? Or can we get away with just using v2 for all the new backends moving forward...