Dmitrii Shmatko
Dmitrii Shmatko
Same for `RespondingEth2Peer`'s `requestDataColumnSidecarsByRoot` and `requestDataColumnSidecarsByRange`. We need implementation for tests
> EDIT: I thought about this more and chatted with the team. > > I think we do want to couple the custody with the long-lived subscriptions because the custody...
Currently we have a discussion to drop this rule, so this is definitely a bottom of backlog for now as this rule could be dropped
closed as duplicate of #9615
There is a good chance it could be fixed by https://github.com/Consensys/teku/pull/9268 because it was a huge reorg after "syncing completed" and this PR will allow to reorg earlier putting less...
Previous report should be rechecked because in the next report Sunnyside didn't confirm 4x bandwidth usage for Teku. New numbers are more or less close for all clients. For 100...
It should be fixed by #10188 and #10193 It's not in the release yet, I will update the issue, when release is available
I wanted to deduct it from last finalized, do we deduct 4096 from head epoch?? I thought we count only finalized, not? I think your formula makes sense
Alternatively, if we want to get cheaper computation we could have separate table with proofs from pruned DataColumnSidecars and it will require only extension computation which is very cheap. But...
so there are issues left like ``` Execution failed for task ':generateLicenseReport'. > Resolution of the configuration ':acceptance-tests:runtimeClasspath' was attempted without an exclusive lock. This is unsafe and not allowed....