ZeroTierOne icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
ZeroTierOne copied to clipboard

zerotier install does not provide oel8 rpms / aarch64 but oel7 / aarch64 ones which seems surprising.

Open sjmudd opened this issue 4 years ago • 1 comments

No package for oel/centos/rhel 8 aarch64 ?

I installed zerotier via the shell script and notice that even though the OS is OEL8 on aarch64 the rpms that have been installed for zerotier-one are for OEL7 aarch64. Is this intentional as it seems confusing?

[root@instance-20210707-1637 ~]# systemctl status zerotier-one
● zerotier-one.service - ZeroTier One
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/zerotier-one.service; disabled; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: active (running) since Thu 2021-11-25 20:17:25 GMT; 4min 27s ago
 Main PID: 14493 (zerotier-one)
    Tasks: 3 (limit: 8911)
   Memory: 4.8M
   CGroup: /system.slice/zerotier-one.service
           └─14493 /usr/sbin/zerotier-one

Nov 25 20:17:25 instance-20210707-1637 systemd[1]: Started ZeroTier One.
[root@instance-20210707-1637 ~]# rpm -qa | grep release
mysql80-community-release-el8-1.noarch
ksplice-release-el8-1.0-4.el8.aarch64
oracle-epel-release-el8-1.0-3.el8.aarch64
oraclelinux-release-el8-1.0-20.el8.aarch64
redhat-release-8.5-0.8.0.1.el8.aarch64
oci-included-release-el8-1.0-4.el8.aarch64
oraclelinux-developer-release-el8-1.0-6.el8.aarch64
oraclelinux-release-8.5-1.0.7.el8.aarch64
epel-release-8-13.el8.noarch
[root@instance-20210707-1637 ~]# rpm -qa | grep zerotier-one
zerotier-one-1.8.3-1.el7.aarch64                                    <<<<<==== notice .el7 not .el8
[root@instance-20210707-1637 ~]# zerotier-cli info
200 info e3XXXXXX64 1.8.3 ONLINE
[root@instance-20210707-1637 ~]#

I removed the rpm and reinstalled it and I get back the same oel7 / aarch64 version. I would expect to get an oel8 / aarch64 version.

zerotier seems configured correctly.

[root@instance-20210707-1637 ~]# zerotier-cli peers
200 peers
<ztaddr>   <ver>  <role> <lat> <link> <lastTX> <lastRX> <path>
61d294b9cb -      PLANET   167 DIRECT 8828     3652     50.7.73.34/9993
62f865ae71 -      PLANET   176 DIRECT 13832    3646     50.7.252.138/9993
778cde7190 -      PLANET   101 DIRECT 8828     3721     103.195.103.66/9993
992fcf1db7 -      PLANET    54 DIRECT -1       3769     195.181.173.159/9993
[root@instance-20210707-1637 ~]#

So my real question is about the rpm naming which feels broken even if maybe it's intentional and it actually works?

sjmudd avatar Nov 25 '21 20:11 sjmudd

We're in the process of revamping our build system. Stay tuned =) -s

On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:08 PM Simon J Mudd @.***> wrote:

Correction: zerotier connectivity was fine. User error not knowing the right process to join the network. I'm still curious about the rpm versioning though.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne/issues/1502#issuecomment-979469538, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAQ3TAP475I45W3WP2PQO3UN2QVFANCNFSM5IZIYCJA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.

someara avatar Nov 26 '21 16:11 someara