Prepare for 5.2 AST bump
This PR is a patch for an upcoming release of ppxlib where the internal AST is bumped from 4.14 to 5.2. Until that is merged and released, there is no reason to merge this PR.
Note in these changes that I'm not entirely sure of the correctness of the process_expr_loc which now must do all of the parameters that may appear in the function.
To test these changes, you can use the following opam-based workflow. I've made releases of most of these patches to an opam-repository overlay.
opam switch create ppxlib-bump --repos=ppxlib=git+https://github.com/patricoferris/opam-repository#5.2-ast-bump
opam install <your-package>
The following describes the most notable changes to the AST.
Note: no update has been made of the opam file, but ppxlib will likely need a lower-bound before merging/releasing.
Functions
Currently
In the parsetree currently, functions like:
fun x y z -> ...
Are represented roughly as
Pexp_fun(x, Pexp_fun (y, Pexp_fun(z, ...)))
Functions like:
function A -> ... | B -> ...
Are represented roughly as
Pexp_function ([ case A; case B ])
Since 5.2
All of these functions now map to a single AST node Pexp_function (note, this is the same name as the old cases function). The first argument is a list of parameters meaning:
fun x y z -> ...
Now looks like:
Pexp_function([x; y; z], _constraint, body)
And the body is where we can either have more expressions (Pfunction_body _) or cases (Pfunction_cases _). That means:
function A -> ... | B -> ...
Has an empty list of parameters:
Pexp_function([], _, Pfunction_cases ([case A; case B]))
Local Module Opens for Types
Another feature added in 5.2 was the ability to locally open modules in type definitions.
module M = struct
type t = A | B | C
end
type t = Local_open_coming of M.(t)
This has a Ptyp_open (module_identifier, core_type) AST node. Just like normal module opens this does create some syntactic ambiguity about where things come from inside the parentheses.
Thank you for that. I'll take a look shortly.
@xguerin sorry to bother you. Do you have any news on that?
Sorry for the delay. The PR looks good. I'll push a new release.