feat: format object properties with types

[vankop]

This PR contains a:

• [ ] bugfix
• [x] new feature
• [ ] code refactor
• [ ] test update
• [ ] typo fix
• [ ] metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

https://github.com/webpack/schema-utils/issues/42 2nd proposal

Breaking Changes

no

Additional Info

Looks like for array and object we can skip formatting type.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #59 (db7e4f6) into master (62fb107) will decrease coverage by 0.58%. The diff coverage is 97.67%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #59      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.72%   98.13%   -0.59%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         550      645      +95     
  Branches      250      268      +18     
==========================================
+ Hits          543      633      +90     
- Misses          7       12       +5     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/ValidationError.js	97.68% <97.33%> (-0.67%)	:arrow_down:
src/index.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/keywords/absolutePath.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/util/Range.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/validate.js	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update 62fb107...db7e4f6. Read the comment docs.

[vankop]

Yes objects and arrays are not expanded

[vankop]

Multiple types could be only with anyOf | oneOf. Here we just look on type if it exists

[vankop]

so @evilebottnawi what we need in this PR still? Tests on additionalProperties ?

[alexander-akait]

@vankop all is good, i will review deeply this in near future

[alexander-akait]

/cc @vankop need rebase, also i think we should improve output using \n (like prettier do with objects :smile: ), because some error is very long

[vankop]

also i think we should improve output using \n

@evilebottnawi you have any ideas how to do it better?

When I did this I was thinking about it, but did not realized how to do it better, since it depends totally on terminal window size + font type/size. Approach when we rely only on amount of properties also fails because of glyph sizes

[alexander-akait]

@vankop the good question, maybe we can solve this in other PR, i think packages like table have algorithm for this, need look on them logic

[vankop]

/cc @evilebottnawi

Ready to review

maybe we can solve this in other PR, i think packages like table have algorithm for this, need look on them logic

I think this really important, I will take a look in table package, thanks for suggestion

[vankop]

Also interesting question is - do we need sort properties alphabetically?