enhanced-resolve icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
enhanced-resolve copied to clipboard

[Feature Request]: Support resolve the modules with hard-links

Open colinaaa opened this issue 1 year ago • 5 comments

What problem does this feature solve?

pnpm creates hard links from the global store to the project's node_modules folders.

For example, imagine you have the following directory structure: packages/a and packages/b have the same version of lodash as a dependency. But they are different symlink that points to different files.

.
├── node_modules
│   ├── a -> ../packages/a
├── package.json
├── packages
│   ├── a
│   │   ├── index.ts
│   │   ├── node_modules
│   │   │   ├── b -> ../../b
│   │   │   └── lodash -> ../../../node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/lodash
│   │   └── package.json
│   └── b
│       ├── index.ts
│       ├── node_modules
│       │   └── lodash -> .pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/lodash
│       ├── package.json
│       ├── pnpm-lock.yaml
│       └── pnpm-workspace.yaml
├── pnpm-lock.yaml
└── pnpm-workspace.yaml

Since two lodash/lodash.js points to different files, both rspack(or oxc internally) and webpack(or enhanced-resolve internally) treat the two files as unrelated. So at build time, two copies of lodash code will be packaged in the output bundle, even if their content is the same.

However, it can be found that in the file system, the two lodash.js point exactly to the same inode node. Which means they are the same file in physical storage.

$ ls -i packages/a/node_modules/lodash/lodash.js
2249211 packages/a/node_modules/lodash/lodash.js

$ ls -i packages/b/node_modules/lodash/lodash.js
2249211 packages/b/node_modules/lodash/lodash.js

To solve the problem, we created an enhanced-resolve plugin to cache the request:

import fs from 'node:fs'

import type { ResolveRequest, Resolver } from 'enhanced-resolve'

class InodeWebpackPlugin {
  static #source = 'resolved'

  apply(resolver: Resolver) {
    resolver
      .getHook(InodeWebpackPlugin.#source)
      .tapAsync('INodeCachePlugin', (request, _, callback) => {
        if (!request.path) {
          return callback()
        }

        try {
          const { ino } = fs.statSync(request.path)

          const cachedRequest = this.#cache.get(ino)
          if (cachedRequest) {
            // Note that the query may change for the same path
            // with a different query.
            Object.assign(request, { ...cachedRequest, query: request.query })
            return callback()
          }

          this.#cache.set(ino, request)
        } catch {
          // explicitly ignore error
        }

        return callback()
      })
  }

  #cache = new Map<number, ResolveRequest>()
}

And it works as expected in webpack, the duplicated modules have been eliminated.

So I wonder if this could be added to enhanced-resolve(just like the symlinks options).

Related issue: https://github.com/web-infra-dev/rspack/issues/5912

colinaaa avatar Mar 11 '24 15:03 colinaaa

Yea, sonds good, do you want to send a PR, also is it possible to enable it by default, i.e. pnpm has ability to detect that it is pnpm, so we will enable this option by default in webpack?

alexander-akait avatar Mar 11 '24 15:03 alexander-akait

Sure! I'm glad to send a PR. But actually, I'm not 100% sure about the correctness. Since it will make the compilation unstable(depends on the order of the requests).

colinaaa avatar Mar 11 '24 15:03 colinaaa

@colinaaa I think we have the same issue in webpack, need to search

alexander-akait avatar Mar 11 '24 15:03 alexander-akait

https://github.com/webpack-contrib/css-loader/issues/1507, I think related

alexander-akait avatar Mar 11 '24 15:03 alexander-akait

@colinaaa As far as I know, pnpm created multiple hardlinks because it needs to ensure the accuracy of the peer dependencies.

how-peers-are-resolved

In your example, lodash should have no peer. Maybe you should check if .pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/lodash and .pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/lodash are also symlinks. They will eventually point to the same file.

In addition, simple cache should not solve the problem. And it will also destroy the accuracy of peerDependencies.

If the bar has a peer: baz@^1.0.0 if node_modules/.pnpm/xxxx/bar is replaced with node_modules/.pnpm/yyyy/bar. bar will read to baz1.1.0 instead of [email protected]

- package-a
  - [email protected] -> node_modules/.pnpm/xxxx/bar
  - [email protected]
- package-b
  - [email protected] -> node_modules/.pnpm/yyyy/bar
  - [email protected]

fzxen avatar Jul 05 '24 02:07 fzxen