Warp Support for ipad

Discord username (optional)

Carsten#7353

Describe the solution you'd like?

Hi I would think warp is ideal for use on iPad.  

With all the completions etc.

Maybe there could be some synergies with https://github.com/blinksh/blink (my current favorite Terminal App on the iPad) or https://secureshellfish.app ?

Great job so far! Thanks.

Carsten

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

No response

Additional context

No response

How important is this feature to you?

4

Warp Internal (ignore) - linear-label:770f6576-d6c0-4e4f-a259-fc64b5156087

No response

Nov 10 '22 18:11 cschaba

Thanks for this feature request! Please +1 this request as it helps us gauge interest. We will post any updates here.

Nov 10 '22 18:11 dannyneira

+1. I currently use blink and la terminal on iPad but would love Warp there.

Nov 13 '22 14:11 clarkezone

+1

Nov 16 '22 08:11 obelixA

That would be such a life saver. Dreaming of the iPad version.

Mar 20 '23 15:03 cybercrow

I’m ready to buy it for 10$ per year. Looks like a good deal for such amazing product. M1 support should be enough and easy to port.

May 16 '23 17:05 tkgreg

big +1 here for the ipad version :)

May 31 '23 09:05 danielavetica

Part of our roadmap is to support Warp on the WebAssembly, so if iPad browsers support it may be possible in the future?! 🤞

May 31 '23 22:05 dannyneira

Please not in the browser. I wouldn't use that.

Jun 07 '23 12:06 clarkezone

+1

Nov 19 '23 18:11 pmahdavii

👍

Jan 29 '24 22:01 dkauper

+1 i would love this!

Jan 31 '24 00:01 adoolaard

+1

May 09 '24 14:05 ivanlei

+1

May 09 '24 19:05 paprins

+1

May 10 '24 21:05 adoolaard

+1

May 15 '24 10:05 filiperochalopes

+1

May 20 '24 05:05 andrew-manger

This would be amazing. I don't think there is anybody that wouldn't pay a subscription even for having warp on ipad.

May 22 '24 07:05 bjurecska

This would be amazing. I don't think there is anybody that wouldn't pay a subscription even for having warp on ipad.

I wouldn't pay a subscription for a terminal, that's bs.

May 22 '24 13:05 andrew-manger

+1

May 22 '24 15:05 pure-js

This would be amazing. I don't think there is anybody that wouldn't pay a subscription even for having warp on ipad.

I wouldn't pay a subscription for a terminal, that's bs.

Existing iOS terminals already ask for a subscribtion - usually around 20$ a year, but they are not even close to the WARP

May 22 '24 15:05 pure-js

This would be amazing. I don't think there is anybody that wouldn't pay a subscription even for having warp on ipad.

I wouldn't pay a subscription for a terminal, that's bs.

Existing iOS terminals already ask for a subscribtion - usually around 20$ a year, but they are not even close to the WARP

And that's exactly why I don't use them 😂 I like to own my stuff so I'm pretty biased against subscriptions on principal

May 22 '24 17:05 andrew-manger

@andrew-manger I am not saying a subscription mode is for everybody, but if you had the choice of buying a subscription and having warp on an iPad pro or not have it at all, then it would suit everybody. You could still chose to not buy it, and other people who are willing to pay the money could have a chance to use it on an iPad pro. Anyways warp is already a subscription based terminal. Maybe you use the free version, which is cool but there is already features that require payments. The single payment based model to outright own your stuff does not bring good quality software as you would want to be making sure that the software you bought keeps getting fixes and new features and it's not reasonable to assume they will do that for free, as it costs them money to pay for the developers who make those features. I pay for gitkraken monthly as well and I love the simplicity it provides. I feel the same way about warp, ever since I use it, my workflow simplified by a lot, and I am willing to pay monthly for that, and I believe I am not alone in this regard.

May 22 '24 18:05 bjurecska

+1