Issue 574, order of precedence
This looks like a duplicate of #572 and that one seem to address the comment from @nigelmegitt . @wseltzer , ok to close this pull request and push #572 instead?
No, this PR is the language reviewed by PSIG.
This looks like a duplicate of #572 and that one seem to address the comment from @nigelmegitt . @wseltzer , ok to close this pull request and push #572 instead?
My comment was that the change in #572 is misplaced: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/572#issuecomment-925042556
@nigelmegitt I think this could go in either the Member Agreement or the Process, and it's a lot easier to put it in the Process, so I think it's fine here.
That said, I agree your earlier comment here needs to be addressed.