Align with the work of DPVCG

[besteves4]

In this issue, we will track the work being done on aligning ODRL with the outputs of the Data Privacy Vocabulary (DPV) (being developed by the DPVCG) towards the publication of a joint report.

[vroddon]

@besteves4 any news here? Should we close this issue?

[besteves4]

Definitely not, I am actively working on it :) We will publish the joint DPV-ODRL mapping under the https://w3id.org/dpv/mappings/odrl# namespace and a guide document on how to use DPV and ODRL under the https://w3id.org/dpv/guides/dpv-odrl namespace. If anyone is interested in this work or wants to provide feedback, please get in touch with me!

[besteves4]

Currently, we have an under-development version of the DPV-ODRL mapping at https://dev.dpvcg.org/mappings/odrl/ and a guide document on how to use this mapping at https://dev.dpvcg.org/guides/dpv-odrl. Feel free to leave comments here or email them to me. Feedback is very welcome!

[riannella]

In the Guide, Example 1:

• can you use odrl:use instead of dpv-odrl:Use
• can you use odrl:purpose instead of dpv-odrl:Purpose

In Example 2:

• this "odrl:assigner [ a dpv:DataController ] ;" does not tell me who the assigner is, only their type

In Example 3:

• can you use odrl:PartyCollection instead of dpv:PartyCollection
• can you use odrl:Party instead of dpv-odrl:Entity
• to be clear on the semantics of this policy, the assigner is every AcademicScientificOrganisation in the ex:entities datasource ?

In Example 4:

• should the Belgium refinement be a constraint?

In Example 5:

• can you use odrl:Asset instead of dpv-odrl:PersonalData

In Example 6:

• should odrl:justifications be odrl:rightOperand
• I think the refinement should be a constraint

[joshcornejo]

Examples 1 - 4:

• odrl:target pd:BankAccount ; // pd:BankAccount isn't an odrl:Asset "A Rule MAY have none or one relation sub-property values of type Asset".