Jay Asbury

Protecting remote branch deletion is the idea. Being able to recover local is a lot easier with reflog. You also affect others using repo when deleting a remote branch. So...

Because local is recoverable with reflog. You can recreate it. Remote branches could be not in reflog. Think of local and remote as two sandboxes. You can play in your...

Answering the arbitrary comment. The head check verifies all commits are in reflog of local since saying is merged with head is equivalent to saying are all commits of remote...

@mstv so do the deleting as last step before switching. Or use obsolete branches plugin to do a not head but specific branch check of merged to then chose the...

@mstv  I made a local branch from net7.0 branch and created arbitrary local branch from a merged branch earlier so one not merged and one merged. I have master...

@mstv You get that lost objects recoverability till your copy has commits A-F and something pushes commits G-X commits. So removing a branch on a remote is never guaranteed to...

Press f12 and then do this process. Then find the command that was run. reply with the command. A directory diff will pull commit files to a temp folder.

How about just making it a nuget package that all we do is pull down the referenced version. So we can pull down v1.1 or whatever because that's the version...

I agree this is a problem but I feel it is more a git issue. Git should reset other flags if setting other flags. I'd raise it up there too.

> Occasionally, I close the progress dialog too quickly (my click finger is quicker than I think). It would be good to keep that _last_ output. Then I could activate...