fix(devti): 优化 SSE 数据解析逻辑
- 新增 dataBuilder 用于合并多行 data 内容
- 调整逻辑以处理非标准格式的 SSE 数据
大佬,之前提交给标记成Draft了。又重新提交了下,麻烦看下这样修改是不是有什么问题。
你这个会影响正常逻辑啊
应该不会吧 我用其他共有模型测试功能正常的。我用月之暗面的
Fengda Huang @.***> 于 2025年4月9日周三 09:07写道:
你这个会影响正常逻辑啊
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/unit-mesh/auto-dev/pull/368#issuecomment-2788006112, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD2SCTH3JEVGYZQZVS5HKQL2YRXDVAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2XT6NI6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGAYDMMJRGI . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***> phodal left a comment (unit-mesh/auto-dev#368) https://github.com/unit-mesh/auto-dev/pull/368#issuecomment-2788006112
你这个会影响正常逻辑啊
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/unit-mesh/auto-dev/pull/368#issuecomment-2788006112, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD2SCTH3JEVGYZQZVS5HKQL2YRXDVAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2XT6NI6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGAYDMMJRGI . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
还要测试自定义 AI Agent 等场景,等我有空的时候再测试一下
好的 明白了
Fengda Huang @.***> 于 2025年4月9日周三 14:02写道:
还要测试自定义 AI Agent 等场景,等我有空的时候再测试一下
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/unit-mesh/auto-dev/pull/368#issuecomment-2788364959, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD2SCTFSBWU4RLKYM2UM34T2YSZVPAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2XT6NI6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGM3DIOJVHE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***> phodal left a comment (unit-mesh/auto-dev#368) https://github.com/unit-mesh/auto-dev/pull/368#issuecomment-2788364959
还要测试自定义 AI Agent 等场景,等我有空的时候再测试一下
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/unit-mesh/auto-dev/pull/368#issuecomment-2788364959, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD2SCTFSBWU4RLKYM2UM34T2YSZVPAVCNFSM6AAAAAB2XT6NI6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDOOBYGM3DIOJVHE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>