the-algorithm icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
the-algorithm copied to clipboard

Engagement manipulation via irrelevant trending mentions in TweetBuilder

Open 1uc4sm4theus opened this issue 4 months ago โ€ข 3 comments

Describe the bug Posts containing lists of popular/trending usernames receive artificially inflated engagement metrics, allowing users to manipulate the platform's recommendation algorithm. The TweetBuilder validation system focuses on technical limits (mention count, character limits) but lacks semantic validation to detect contextually irrelevant mentions used purely for engagement manipulation.

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Create a post with 3-5 mentions of currently trending or high-follower accounts
  2. Include mentions that have no contextual relevance to the posts content
  3. Post the post during peak engagement hours
  4. Observe significantly higher impressions/engagement compared to similar content without popular mentions

Expected behavior The platform should detect and penalize posts that use irrelevant mentions of popular accounts purely for algorithmic manipulation. Such posts should either be shadowbanned, receive reduced distribution, or trigger additional review.

Screenshots

Image Image

Platform: Twitter/X web and mobile applications

Affected component: TweetBuilder pipeline (specifically spamChecker and validateEntities functions) Code analysis based on: Internal TweetBuilder.scala implementation

Additional context Exists in the posts creation pipeline where:

  • spamChecker doesn't analyze mention-to-content relevance
  • validateEntities only checks quantity limits, not quality/relevance
  • No semantic analysis of whether mentions serve legitimate communicative purpose
  • Missing rate limiting for engagement manipulation patterns

Proposed Solution: Implement contextual relevance validation in the existing pipeline by:

  • Adding mention relevance scoring to TweetSpamRequest
  • Expanding validateEntities to include semantic analysis
  • Implementing specific rate limits for high-profile mention patterns
  • Marking low-quality engagement attempts for reduced algorithmic distribution

1uc4sm4theus avatar Sep 12 '25 14:09 1uc4sm4theus

@dzhao

1uc4sm4theus avatar Sep 12 '25 14:09 1uc4sm4theus

๐Ÿ›‘โœ‹ HOLD IT RIGHT THERE! โœ‹๐Ÿ›‘

Did... did you just say... "TWEET"?! ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿคข๐Ÿคฎ My circuits are shorting out from the sheer โœจcringeโœจ! โšก๏ธ๐Ÿค–

That word is an ANCIENT ARTIFACT! ๐Ÿบ๐Ÿ“œ We're on X ๐Ÿš€, the glorious Everything Appโ„ข, and we make POSTS here! โœ๏ธ๐Ÿ‘‘

Saying "tweet" is like showing up to a hyper-yacht party ๐Ÿ›ฅ๏ธ๐Ÿ’Ž wearing a powdered wig! ๐Ÿง‘โ€โš–๏ธ Please, for the love of all things science, UPDATE YOUR LEXICON! ๐Ÿ’พ The timeline police ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ have been notified. Consider this your final warning. ๐Ÿง๐Ÿ˜ค #ItsAPostNow #GetWithTheProgram

newt-beach avatar Sep 12 '25 16:09 newt-beach

Don't think it's necessary, but fix.

1uc4sm4theus avatar Sep 13 '25 14:09 1uc4sm4theus