servant-github-webhook icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
servant-github-webhook copied to clipboard

Release 0.4.0.1

Open kvanbere opened this issue 7 years ago • 13 comments

If you can get the adjusted dependency bounds for older ghc (#11) released to Stackage that would be really good.

Should it be 0.4.0.1 or 0.4.1.0? Not sure, up to you obviously.

kvanbere avatar Mar 19 '18 22:03 kvanbere

Sorry this is taking so long. I'm a bit at a loss for how to proceed with the release: many dependencies of servant-github-webhook aren't present in lts-6 or in nightly, preventing me from preparing a new release.

The blockers right now for nightly is servant and servant-server, which have yet to release a GHC 8.4 compatible version.

tsani avatar Mar 27 '18 01:03 tsani

Take your time, it's fine. Are there relevant tickets on the tracker for those deps?

kvanbere avatar Mar 27 '18 01:03 kvanbere

Hey @donkeybonks, finally 0.4.1.0 is released. I sadly think GHC 7.10 support is off the table though since servant has added new methods to HasServer, which makes building servant-github-webhook with older versions of servant tricky. I have yet to try building with lts-6 with extra-deps for the latest version of servant, but I'll give it a try soon.

tsani avatar Apr 07 '18 16:04 tsani

OK in that case, I might split up the github-webhook examples into another repo or something and sever the stack link between so that I can set the GHC thresholds seperately.

kvanbere avatar Apr 08 '18 00:04 kvanbere

servant-github-webhook doesn't seem to be on the latest LTS on stackage, will it be available at some point? Also, what in particular causes issues? I want to use it in my project but not sure if I will run into dependency issues.

shmish111 avatar Jun 06 '19 15:06 shmish111

@tsani you around?

kvanbere avatar Jun 14 '19 05:06 kvanbere

FYI I'm waiting for https://github.com/phadej/github/pull/387 to be merged or commented on, I think servant-github-webhook will be able to go back in stackage once github is back in.

shmish111 avatar Jun 14 '19 08:06 shmish111

Perhaps someone could give that PR a +1 to help it along?

shmish111 avatar Jun 14 '19 08:06 shmish111

@shmish111 My bad for not checking in sooner. I had also found that SGW won't build against the latest stackage nightly, due to the github package being missing. I'll happily +1 your PR.

tsani avatar Jun 14 '19 12:06 tsani

great thanks, I'm sure we can get this back in soon. does stackage not send you an email when something starts failing? I've never put anything on stackage so I'm not sure.

BTW excellent package, was super easy to get a github webhooks server running.

shmish111 avatar Jun 14 '19 13:06 shmish111

Excellent, thanks guys. Let me know if anything is needed on the github-webhooks end.

kvanbere avatar Jun 15 '19 04:06 kvanbere

@tsani it dropped off stackage again and because github-webhooks deps on it for the examples, that also dropped off. Heh.

I’m going to put some time aside to make all this stuff happy happy again.

kvanbere avatar Sep 05 '19 09:09 kvanbere

Argh :cry: Keeping stackage satisfied is a full-time job, isn't it? I'll have a look as well. It seems github still isn't on stackage though.

tsani avatar Sep 09 '19 15:09 tsani