Tomasz Pluskiewicz
Tomasz Pluskiewicz
That does make sense but isn't it the opposite of what you said on Discord and also to how the engines behave? I don't know which version of SHACL_TQ weso.es...
ah ok, I failed to really understand before. Yes, without a logic as described by Holger this cannot work. Otherwise it does assume that no targets found => no validation
Can you link to the spec where this is scenario mentioned?
Here's the smallest I could quickly concoct by extracting the setup from my project: https://gist.github.com/tpluscode/149377e20f27a47ae0e02fdd453f10a7
`npx eslint element.ts --quiet` will give you one error from the propety
> Maybe @tpluscode can suggest an improvement Not without diving deeper. I suggest we create a ticket to improve in the future and roll with what we have now
Do we even need the full list copied to the report?
Re #129, I was also thinking to propose a configuration option where you'd define how many items of a list to keep (might default to `3` but maybe a little...
Then the comment would need to be simplified as `sh:in has been removed from the report for brevity. Please refer the original shape`
Could this be merged?