Tamas K. Papp

@fredrikekre, I also noticed that you comment Registry PRs with suggestions for bounds, and in cases block registration for this. While I understand that in a mature ecosystem version bounding...

@fredrikekre: I understand the goal, I just probably missed when that was announced as a requirement. In any case, I added a constraint for Julia to the skeleton.jl template so...

In the meantime, perhaps remove the suggestion of the PPA from the readme? `make deb` works fine on Ubuntu

Thinking about it, perhaps ```julia Base.:*(a::LaTeXString, b::AbstractString) = LaTeXString(a.s * b) ``` and similar would be better. The automatic appending of `$`s is not always the best choice.

Is it actually guaranteed that the the support is zero outside the extrema of `x`? I would have to look at the code, but I don't think it holds in...

I am not quite sure it would make sense directly (with `+` and `-`). I am assuming that the underlying operation `op` you are thinking of is something like ```...

I checked Matlab and R, both offer the tests and the statistic for what is `δ`, `δn`, and `δp` in this library, but do not conflate it with `p`-value calculations....

I can not reproduce this, with ```julia (v1) pkg> st KernelDensity Status `~/.julia/environments/v1/Project.toml` [31c24e10] Distributions v0.16.4 [a98d9a8b] Interpolations v0.11.2 [5ab0869b] KernelDensity v0.5.1 [429524aa] Optim v0.17.2 [2913bbd2] StatsBase v0.27.0 ```

Probably that should go in a separate package. This is a community-maintained package of basic methods.

Improved, compared to `central_fdm(5, 1)`, but `central_fdm(20, 1)` is still better (2-3 digits more accuracy). `factor = 1e6` works fine though. Is that what I should do in this case,...