Thiago Araújo Silva

Personally, I think option 1 is less strict and more appropriate. With option 2, we are forcing the user to go with a particular Ruby version; for instance, if I...

Side note: we are working on making the Ruby version range more flexible: https://github.com/thoughtbot/suspenders/issues/1073 But this should provide a quick fix in the meantime.

Minitest is great, but I don't think we should use it by default. The reason is that it's too barebones and requires helper gems to come a bit closer to...

@emilford I don't remember, as I don't regularly work with Minitest projects. But at the very minimum, a better test runner and better matchers for more powerful and expressive assertions...

To be more specific, here are some features I would miss in Minitest: - `match_`, `have_`, etc, assertions. In Minitest, it's common to do something like `assert_equal expected_array, actual_array.sort` instead...

Just to be extra clear, I prefer xUnit-like tests to spec-style tests. I'm not a big fan of `expect` and that verbose style that tries to resemble English. The main...

@stevepolitodesign If we can find something that covers the more urgent gaps, such as a decent test runner, better diffing and error reporting, more powerful assertions, etc, it may be...