feat: allow custom glob functions other than picomatch

[43081j]

This allows you to pass in your own globFunction rather than picomatch, so we're not forcing a choice here (someone may want to use a simpler library or a newer picomatch).

Example:

function globFunction(
  patterns: string | string[],
) {
  return (test) => {
    // some glob match logic
  };
}

const api = new fdir({globFunction})
  .glob('*.js')
  .crawl(cwd);
const files = await api.withPromise();

benchmark seems to be about the same as before on my machine

this also means the options stay strongly typed for whatever glob function you use i think. some example of that:

interface GlobOptions {
  x: number;
}

declare function globFunction(patterns: string|string[], options?: GlobOptions): GlobMatcher;

const api = new fdir({globFunction});

api.globWithOptions(
  ['*.js'],
  {
    x: 100, // works
    y: 200, // errors, since `GlobOptions` has no such prop
  }
);

[43081j]

happy to update so we have a setter too if that works!

we can have withGlobFunction or some such thing which sets the same property

will wait and see what @thecodrr thinks 👍

[43081j]

should be sorted now 👍

i loosened the types on the way in to unknown and infer the strong types when you call globWithOptions

reason for this is because picomatch exports a conditional type which confuses inference here (we end up with it having a return type of never because the compiler can't infer it)

[43081j]

@thecodrr any chance you can take another look at this?

[thecodrr]

@43081j super busy right now but will take a look tomorrow!

[43081j]

all good. let me know if you need any help

same with the other roadmap stuff you wanted to get done, happy to help

[SuperchupuDev]

the documentation.md file should be updated with the new options i think? looks like you missed that

[thecodrr]

I think before this can be merged, we should test the API with some other glob matching libraries and see how compatible & easy this is to use. The glob & globWithOptions functions were designed to be very picomatch specific so I am not sure if the current design and implementation still makes sense if other libraries are used.

[43081j]

That's true, I'll try it out when I get chance

The types do infer the options parameter but maybe we don't need to do that, and can just rely on people binding it in (instead of having globWithOptions)

[43081j]

@thecodrr I tried this with zeptomatch:

 const globFunction = (glob: string) => (path: string): boolean => zeptomatch(glob, path);
 const api = new fdir({globFunction})
   .glob("**/*.js")
   .crawl("node_modules");
 const files = await api.withPromise();

the glob function looks funky here just because zeptomatch doesn't return a factory function, but that's all good. it seems to work fine 👍

[43081j]

@thecodrr any chance I can get some time from you to move this along? 🙏