How to proceed with Bytecoder

[keesvandieren]

We have done some changes in the Bytecoder project. Therefore we are building our own SNAPSHOT project.

We would like to be based on a release, as this simplifies working with Bytecoder for us

Minimalistic approach

maintainer merges Bytecoder 474. This is really needed to continue without snapshot.

Non-minimalistic approach

We create PRs for all our other changes in Bytecoder as well. With that approach, we have to cope with SNAPSHOT build for longer period of time. And Bytecoder maintainer needs to have time to review and merge.

Advantage is that Bytecoder web APIs will be better, which is an advantage for non-libgdx Bytecoder users.

Actions:

• Contact Bytecoder maintainer: is he available to review the PRs?
• depending on outcome, continue with the minimalistic or non-minimalistic approach.

[keesvandieren]

One thing to ask: can we make the wasm (without llvm) work with our project? That would be really beneficial for our users (easier to set up env).

[keesvandieren]

@CoenRijsdijk depends on #16 (assigned that issue to you)

[keesvandieren]

Mail sent to maintainer, waiting for reaction.