Standardize Package Structure across Modules [INT-2389]

[spring-operator]

Gunnar Hillert opened INT-2389 and commented

Going through the package structures, it seems that SI Modules generally follow a defined package structure, e.g. org.springframework.integration.<module_name>.config etc.

It seems, though, we have certain deviations e.g. putting stuff into the module root package versus having a "core" package.

This might also be something to think about, when we create a common guideline/documentation for writing custom components.

Some common package structures:

• "inbound"
• "outbound"
• "core" (for common)
• "support" if even core needs something
• "mapping"
• "config"
• The "root" package should contain only exceptions and possibly base interfaces

---

Affects: 2.1 RC2

[spring-operator]

Artem Bilan commented

The modules which are still suffering from wrong package structure:

 

• [x] spring-integration-ws
• [x] spring-integration-stream
• [x] spring-integration-sftp - the gateway must go into an outbound
• [x] spring-integration-mail
• [x] spring-integration-jmx
• [x] spring-integration-jms
• [x] spring-integration-jdbc
• [x] spring-integration-ip
• [x] spring-integration-file
• [x] spring-integration-ftp - the gateway must go into an outbound