Gwendolyn Van Hove
Gwendolyn Van Hove
That sounds like an interesting feature. I would be happy to review a pull request that implements this.
Currently Jasmine's `pending` is more like RSpecs `skip` than anything else. At some point I'd like to get to the point where Jasmine has both `skip` and `pending` mechanisms, with...
I'd be happy to review a pull request that adds a "Pending" tab to the HtmlReporter, including a bit better method to display the message/reason for the pendingness. I'd also...
Even the current `pending` implementation isn't a great fit for what we would want a `skip` to do. It currently only stops execution of the current function, but continues to...
As we discussed in #1634, I don't think this is a thing that Jasmine is likely to add. The generated message for an expectation that has passed will indicate a...
As [I mentioned](https://github.com/jasmine/jasmine/issues/1634#issuecomment-463754394) in #1634, the particular example (`toBe` at that time) didn't necessarily exhibit the particular behavior (I believe it actually does now if the `actual` is an `Object`),...
How are you expecting to use the spied on function in your actual implementation. Node.js most likely isn't going to use the spy when you `import` in the implementation. If...
I would love to hear about how Jest or Mocha or whichever other testing frameworks you're using are able to accomplish what you're trying to do here. As far as...
@jscharett Jasmine should be able to spy on functions from a module in the same way that Jest does with the module mocking. ```javascript var foo = require('foo'); jasmine.spyOn(foo, 'bar');...
Jasmine's `spyOnProperty` is intended for installing a spy over a `get` or `set` property created with `Object.defineProperty`, whereas `spyOn` is intended for installing a spy over an existing `function`. @gund,...