files_upload_v2 returns internal_error when using markdown in blocks
files_upload_v2 returns internal_error when using markdown in blocks parameter
Reproducible in:
slack-bolt==1.25.0
slack-sdk==3.36.0
Python 3.13.5
ProductName: macOS
ProductVersion: 15.5
BuildVersion: 24F74
Darwin Kernel Version 24.5.0
The Slack SDK version
slack-bolt==1.25.0
slack-sdk==3.36.0
Python runtime version
Python 3.13.5
OS info
ProductName: macOS
ProductVersion: 15.5
BuildVersion: 24F74
Darwin Kernel Version 24.5.0: Tue Apr 22 19:53:27 PDT 2025; root:xnu-11417.121.6~2/RELEASE_ARM64_T6041
Steps to reproduce:
1. Code Example
from slack_sdk.web.async_client import AsyncWebClient
import json
# Initialize client
client = AsyncWebClient(token="xoxb-your-token")
# Prepare parameters
channel_id = "D099T7G7VHD" # DM channel
blocks = [{"type": "markdown", "text": "_**Haim Raitsev** posted a new message_\\n> test"}]
files = [{"id": "F09J0L8TDRQ", "title": "screenshot.png"}]
# Attempt to upload with blocks
response = await client.files_upload_v2(
channel=channel_id,
file_uploads=[
{
"content": b"<file_bytes_here>",
"filename": "screenshot.png",
"title": "screenshot.png"
}
],
blocks=json.dumps(blocks)
)
2. Response
{
"ok": False,
"error": "internal_error"
}
Expected result:
The file should be uploaded successfully with the rich text blocks displayed in the message, as the underlying files.completeUploadExternal:
Actual result:
The API returns {"ok": false, "error": "internal_error"} without any additional error details.
Additional Context:
This issue is reproduced only when we have a new markdown block (https://docs.slack.dev/reference/block-kit/blocks/markdown-block/) when we use other blocks the message posted correctly.
files.completeUploadExternal API Call
HTTP Request
POST https://slack.com/api/files.completeUploadExternal HTTP/1.1
Host: slack.com
Authorization: Bearer xoxb-your-token-here
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Request Details
Method: POST
URL: https://slack.com/api/files.completeUploadExternal
Headers:
Authorization: Bearer xoxb-your-token-here
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Body (URL-encoded):
files=[{"id":"F09J0L8TDRQ","title":"screenshot.png"}]
channel_id=D099T7G7VHD
blocks=[{"type":"markdown","text":"_**Haim Raitsev** posted a new message_\\n> test"}]
Body Parameters Breakdown
| Parameter | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
files |
[{"id":"F09J0L8TDRQ","title":"screenshot.png"}] |
JSON array of file objects (URL-encoded) |
channel_id |
D099T7G7VHD |
DM channel ID where file will be shared |
blocks |
[{"type":"markdown","text":"_**Haim Raitsev** posted a new message_\\n> test"}] |
JSON array of blocks (URL-encoded) |
Example using cURL
curl -X POST https://slack.com/api/files.completeUploadExternal \
-H "Authorization: Bearer xoxb-your-token-here" \
-H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
--data-urlencode 'files=[{"id":"F09J0L8TDRQ","title":"screenshot.png"}]' \
--data-urlencode 'channel_id=D099T7G7VHD' \
--data-urlencode 'blocks=[{"type":"markdown","text":"_**Haim Raitsev** posted a new message_\\n> test"}]'
Error Response (Current Issue)
{
"ok": false,
"error": "internal_error"
}
Thank you for maintaining this excellent SDK!
any update?
Hey @haimrait! 👋 Thanks for reporting this and a kind bump 👾 ✨
I can confirm that the files.completeUploadExternal method errors when using the markdown block which seems off to me.
We're investigating this on the backend side of things now, but I might recommend using different blocks in the meantime.
Also, we need to support this argument from the SDK itself I believe - following https://github.com/slackapi/node-slack-sdk/pull/2261. This might be unrelated, but let's track it here for now 🎁
👋 It looks like this issue has been open for 30 days with no activity. We'll mark this as stale for now, and wait 10 days for an update or for further comment before closing this issue out. If you think this issue needs to be prioritized, please comment to get the thread going again! Maintainers also review issues marked as stale on a regular basis and comment or adjust status if the issue needs to be reprioritized.
Hi, any updates? Thanks!