Webhook implementation

[FedericoBernardi]

Is there any way to use webhooks with this library? I managed to fit all our integration with this library! Great job! Only the webhooks are missing

[AlexNDRmac]

Currently webhooks are not implemented, but this feature can be implemented in next version. If you can wait, I'll implement webhooks with some other feature in next SDK version. ETA ~2 weeks.

[FedericoBernardi]

Currently webhooks are not implemented, but this feature can be implemented in next version. If you can wait, I'll implement webhooks with some other feature in next SDK version. ETA ~2 weeks.

Thanks for the reply, of course I can wait. I'll test as soon as it will be available :-) FYI, one more missing feature I think is template upload. A workaround I've found is creating a document, transform the document into template and delete the document

Thanks again

[FedericoBernardi]

Hi Alex, any update about webhooks?

[AlexNDRmac]

Sorry, but Russia attacked my country... we have a war. I'll try to implement as soon as I can

[FedericoBernardi]

No problem, really, I understand. The situation in Ukraine is orribile. The whole democratic world is on your side

[nmg196]

Hope you're OK Alex! This situation is absolutely terrible.

[AlexNDRmac]

Thank you for you support! I'm fine as it can be possible in this situation and trying to implement webhooks.

[nmg196]

Great to hear. I'm amazed how great support has continued to be on Live Chat with all your country is going through. In the mean time I think I can still make use of webhooks using the bare RestAPI and restsharp.

[AlexNDRmac]

I'm working on webhooks implementation now. With your own implementation you might miss some edge cases like data validation, response/request conversion. So if you can wait, I'll try to speedup with implementation.

[nmg196]

Yeah don't rush it :) For me it appears to be working OK in Postman. The only thing I'm not sure about is the possible values for "event" as the docs don't really say. But that said - I have a feeling all I need is "document.complete"

[nmg196]

Do you know if there is a way to subscribe to all "document.complete" events in a particular account? Otherwise I think I need to set up a new webhook for each document (entity_id) individually?

[AlexNDRmac]

user.document.complete should help with subscription for all the documents.

[nmg196]

Regarding the Webhooks 2.0 API, this really caught me out:

• The API endpoint for create or delete (verbs: POST / DELETE) webhooks (events) uses a Bearer token.
• The API endpoint for getting webhooks (verb GET) uses Basic Auth!
• The API endpoint for updating (PUT) uses Bearer token OR Basic Auth

Really confusing. I don't know why all 4 don't just use Basic Auth for all 4 verbs.

Thanks Nick

[alexmohr1966]

Hi, any update on webhook integration? I am currently evaluating the signNow API and webhooks would be such a useful feature. Thanks, Alex

[AlexNDRmac]

Need to finish with GET events implementation, other methods are implemented. I'll back to work on it soon, sorry for the long delay.

[alexmohr1966]

Thanks Alex for your reply. Any chance for sharing the code for creating an event subscription?

[nmg196]

If you need a stop gap (as I did) it's pretty easy to do by hand with a lib like RestSharp (etc). I made a few methods like this to fill in the gaps where there was no C# API. I didn't want ot put Alex under more stress with what he's already dealing with in Ukraine ❤️

[alexmohr1966]

Thank you @nmg196, much appreciated.

[AlexNDRmac]

implemented in v1.3.0, please update signNow packages and use. Thanks