Ken
Moving my comment from the closed PR - I suspect PdfSharp will at some point need to accept this into a major version bump as a breaking change. My interpretation...
I like the revised approach Tony, seems like you're on the right path. By keeping the package upgrade within PdfSharp, I think users are able to stay within the "used...
It wasn't clear which checks were going to be ran in CI so I added a Makefile to make it more obvious. I'll take that out if it isn't desired.
@lukasgeiter Thanks for the feedback! It's been a long week but I will get back to this eventually and clean it up.