serverless
Add ability to individually package functions
Quick pass at adding individual packaging functionality. Mostly looked at the AWS implementation and tried to create parity between here and there.
@pmuens Happy to add tests + get linting, etc. in order if this is something you'd be willing to merge. Mostly don't want to sink any more time into this if that's not the case.
Fixes: #89
Quick pass at adding individual packaging functionality. Mostly looked at the AWS implementation and tried to create parity between here and there.
@pmuens Happy to add tests + get linting, etc. in order if this is something you'd be willing to merge. Mostly don't want to sink any more time into this if that's not the case.
Fixes: #89
Can you please patch eslint problems in order to get travis working ?
@saiaman Feel free to fork my fork and create another PR with the eslint problems resolved if desired. At current I'm unfortunately a bit strapped for time and don't want to invest any more into this particularly with the relative inactivity of this repo.
@wootencl perhaps assigning other maintainers to the repo would help? I'm willing to give a hand, I'm sure other people would do.
@wootencl I've tested your changes, it deploys functions properly 👍
Couple of points I noticed:
- It doesn't work anymore without the
individuallyoption - All the functions upload with the same
.zipsize. Is that normal? I suppose it is right? - *EDIT: A lot of unit tests are failing
Let's join forces to fix them!
@markmssd I'll admit, my availability is opening up a bit so could possibly lend a hand in maintaining this repo. Ultimately though, that decision is up to @pmuens.
