backbeat icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
backbeat copied to clipboard

Fallback into checking the forceLegacyListing parameter when the listing type is not included in the Kafka message

Open Kerkesni opened this issue 1 year ago • 3 comments

The check of forceLegacyListing in the bucket processor was moved to the conductor as the listing type also depends on the MongoDB indexes, which is not something used in S3C.

Lifecycle conductor in 7.x doesn't set the listing type in the bucketProcessor messages. So we now fallback to the forceLegacyListing param inside the config when encountering this case during the transition phase from backbeat 7.x to 8.x/9.x.

Also changed the default value of forceLegacyListing to how it's set in Backbeat 7.x. This is done to avoid any behaviour change in S3C in case the value is not set (which should in theory not be the case in RING10 but just in case)

Issue: BB-550

Kerkesni avatar Sep 19 '24 15:09 Kerkesni

Hello kerkesni,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval :star:
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status :star:
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA :star:
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix :star:
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check :star:
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval :star:
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval :star:
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. :writing_hand:
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

bert-e avatar Sep 19 '24 15:09 bert-e

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically create the integration branches.

bert-e avatar Sep 19 '24 15:09 bert-e

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 69.36%. Comparing base (a1e9895) to head (d8c9131).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
extensions/lifecycle/LifecycleConfigValidator.js 83.33% <ø> (ø)
...ecycle/bucketProcessor/LifecycleBucketProcessor.js 79.22% <100.00%> (+0.64%) :arrow_up:

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Components Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification 66.66% <ø> (ø)
Core Library 74.00% <ø> (ø)
Ingestion 68.70% <ø> (ø)
Lifecycle 75.00% <100.00%> (+0.14%) :arrow_up:
Oplog Populator 82.95% <ø> (ø)
Replication 57.42% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/8.6    #2542      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            69.33%   69.36%   +0.03%     
===================================================
  Files                  194      194              
  Lines                12791    12791              
===================================================
+ Hits                  8869     8873       +4     
+ Misses                3912     3908       -4     
  Partials                10       10              
Flag Coverage Δ
api:retry 9.66% <0.00%> (ø)
api:routes 9.56% <0.00%> (ø)
bucket-scanner 85.76% <ø> (ø)
ingestion 12.47% <0.00%> (ø)
lib 7.55% <0.00%> (ø)
lifecycle 19.43% <100.00%> (+0.04%) :arrow_up:
notification 0.88% <0.00%> (ø)
replication 18.97% <0.00%> (ø)
unit 43.14% <100.00%> (+0.20%) :arrow_up:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

codecov[bot] avatar Sep 19 '24 15:09 codecov[bot]

/approve

Kerkesni avatar Oct 02 '24 13:10 Kerkesni

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

  • this pull request will merge improvement/BB-550 into development/8.6
  • w/8.7/improvement/BB-550 will be merged into development/8.7

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.5

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

bert-e avatar Oct 02 '24 13:10 bert-e

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • :heavy_check_mark: development/8.6

  • :heavy_check_mark: development/8.7

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.5

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

bert-e avatar Oct 02 '24 14:10 bert-e

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request into targetted development branches:

  • :heavy_check_mark: development/8.6

  • :heavy_check_mark: development/8.7

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.5

Please check the status of the associated issue BB-550.

Goodbye kerkesni.

bert-e avatar Oct 02 '24 15:10 bert-e