sequencescape icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
sequencescape copied to clipboard

DPL-1082 - Research use of poolings/new for 'blending pools' (BGE)

Open BenTopping opened this issue 2 years ago • 0 comments

Description Tag clashes prevent the blending of the final two BGE pools via the Sequencescape poolings/new page. We want to identify if it is possible to allow BGE pools to be blended by adapting poolings/new to treat BGE differently. We want to be careful removing any existing poolings/new constraints because other pipelines and processes rely on these constraints. Ideally we would identify the pools as BGE, like library_type, and allow them to be blended or use some other flag like tag_depth to allow them to be blended.

  • [ ] Identify if poolings/new can be adapted to support this 'blending' or if there are any existing workarounds for poolings/new that would allow us to bypass the tag clash constraint.
  • [ ] If poolings/new is not possible we need to document what the issues are so that we can consider them before building blending functionality into Limber.
  • [ ] Create another story if the solution is appropriate or communicate with stakeholders that this option isn’t possible and document why.

Background on BGE available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pp4p2n3wMuDTlwDV6rr6u9hZD0F2-F4FN3PPRauTJ-g/edit?usp=sharing

Who the primary contacts are for this work Ben T, Katy T, Matt M, Liz C

Knowledge or Stake holders Matt M, Liz C

BenTopping avatar Feb 01 '24 15:02 BenTopping