use the url for the archive epel rpm

[mherkazandjian]

PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)

• [x] Changes to documentation are appropriate (or tick if not required)
• [x] Changes to tests are appropriate (or tick if not required)
• [x] Reviews completed

---

What type of PR is this?

Primary type

• [ ] [build] Changes related to the build system
• [ ] [chore] Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
• [ ] [ci] Changes to the continuous integration configuration
• [ ] [feat] A new feature
• [x] [fix] A bug fix
• [ ] [perf] A code change that improves performance
• [ ] [refactor] A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
• [ ] [revert] A change used to revert a previous commit
• [ ] [style] Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)

Secondary type

• [ ] [docs] Documentation changes
• [ ] [test] Adding missing or correcting existing tests

Does this PR introduce a BREAKING CHANGE?

No.

Related issues and/or pull requests

Describe the changes you're proposing

Update the EPEL RPM URL for version 7 from http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-7.noarch.rpm to https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/epel/7.9/x86_64/Packages/e/epel-release-7-12.noarch.rpm since the previous link does not exist anymore. The change ensures the EPEL RPM URL points to a specific archived version for centos 7.

Pillar / config required to test the proposed changes

none

Debug log showing how the proposed changes work

Documentation checklist

• [ ] Updated the README (e.g. Available states).
• [ ] Updated pillar.example.

Testing checklist

• [ ] Included in Kitchen (i.e. under state_top).
• [ ] Covered by new/existing tests (e.g. InSpec, Serverspec, etc.).
• [ ] Updated the relevant test pillar.

Additional context

i did not run test kitchen but i tested the change on a vm and it fixes the problem.