compiler-team icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
compiler-team copied to clipboard

Promote armv7a-none-eabihf to Tier 2

Open thejpster opened this issue 5 months ago • 5 comments

Proposal

I would like to promote armv7a-none-eabihf to Tier 2, to join armv7r-none-eabihf and armv7a-none-eabi. I believe it was simply an oversight that it wasn't made Tier 2 before, as most Armv7-A targets have an FPU and it often makes sense to use it.

The PR is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146522

Process

The main points of the Major Change Process are as follows:

  • [x] File an issue describing the proposal.
  • [x] A compiler team member who is knowledgeable in the area can second by writing @rustbot second or kickoff a team FCP with @rfcbot fcp $RESOLUTION.
  • [ ] Once an MCP is seconded, the Final Comment Period begins.
    • Final Comment Period lasts for 10 days after all outstanding concerns are solved.
    • Outstanding concerns will block the Final Comment Period from finishing. Once all concerns are resolved, the 10 day countdown is restarted.
    • If no concerns are raised after 10 days since the resolution of the last outstanding concern, the MCP is considered approved.

You can read more about Major Change Proposals on forge.

thejpster avatar Sep 14 '25 18:09 thejpster

[!IMPORTANT] This issue is not meant to be used for technical discussion. There is a Zulip stream for that. Use this issue to leave procedural comments, such as volunteering to review, indicating that you second the proposal (or third, etc), or raising a concern that you would like to be addressed.

Concerns or objections can formally be registered here by adding a comment.

@rustbot concern reason-for-concern
<description of the concern>

Concerns can be lifted with:

@rustbot resolve reason-for-concern

See documentation at https://forge.rust-lang.org

cc @rust-lang/compiler

rustbot avatar Sep 14 '25 18:09 rustbot

Compliance with target tier policy is documented in rust-lang/rust#146522 so starting an FCP to approve this per our target approvals docs.

@rfcbot fcp merge

davidtwco avatar Sep 17 '25 10:09 davidtwco

Team member @davidtwco has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

  • [x] @Mark-Simulacrum
  • [x] @Noratrieb
  • [x] @SparrowLii
  • [x] @cjgillot
  • [x] @compiler-errors
  • [x] @davidtwco
  • [x] @estebank
  • [x] @jieyouxu
  • [x] @matthewjasper
  • [x] @nagisa
  • [ ] @oli-obk
  • [x] @petrochenkov
  • [x] @spastorino
  • [x] @wesleywiser

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

rust-rfcbot avatar Sep 17 '25 10:09 rust-rfcbot

:bell: This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. :bell:

rust-rfcbot avatar Sep 30 '25 13:09 rust-rfcbot

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.

rust-rfcbot avatar Oct 10 '25 13:10 rust-rfcbot