Ryan Senne
Ryan Senne
Non sequitur: a long term advancement could be to use [LinearSolvers.jl](https://github.com/SciML/LinearSolve.jl) as well. I could see this being useful for anywhere in the package a linear solve is performed and...
Okay got it. To me this begs the question if it makes sense to keep this functionality? I would agree with you that a trust region method would be more...
Hey @pkofod just wanted to check in on this! Here are my two basic ideas for moving forward: ## Option 1: Linear Solve Dispatch We simplify the code path by...
> I think it would more common to put it inside the Newton method Yes, I agree. That makes better sense. > Does that make sense? I think so. What...
Hey Jose and Julien! Just wondering if there is anything I can start contributing? I could potentially start building out the inhomogeneous architecture, work on implementing some GOF as in...
hey @JoseKling should i get started on some Inhomogeneous PP stuff? Or anything else I can jump on right now?
Looks like i missed this in the code: ``` """ time_change(h, Λ) Apply the time rescaling `t -> Λ(t)` to history `h`. """ function time_change(h::History, Λ) new_times = Λ.(event_times(h)) new_marks...
That sounds great would be happy to join!
Thank you for the response! I think I may not have been clear enough about my suggestion. I'm not proposing to parallelize the sequential processing of the forward algorithm itself...