README: Should have cross-references between urdfdom_headers and urdfdom?
Both the READMEs in this repo and urdfdom do not reference each other at the top-level, which is confusing. I don't know when I should make an issue for urdfdom_headers or urdfdom, esp. related to the specification vs. implementation or whatever.
It would be nice if there were explicit guidance on that: https://github.com/ros/urdfdom_headers/tree/2acf769db0f70205efd612830e2b2f2807862d80 https://github.com/ros/urdfdom/tree/0da4b20675cdbe14b532d484a1c17df85b4e1584 https://github.com/ros/urdf/tree/52a4d5973c4fe8fc60f6ae09d532b8043ce46d28
Relates SDFormat repo split as well: https://github.com/osrf/sdf_tutorials/issues/2 https://github.com/osrf/sdf_tutorials/issues/10 (issue template)
Motivated by these cross-repo issues: https://github.com/ros/urdfdom_headers/issues/59 https://github.com/ros/urdfdom/issues/138
Ah, geez... Yet another repo? https://github.com/ros/urdf/issues
There's also https://github.com/ros/urdf_parser_py.git (for python) and https://github.com/ros/collada_urdf.git (which I believe is related, but I'd have to dig back into the tangled weave again to make sure).
I don't disagree that this is a mess, but it is unfortunately a difficult mess to fix. Some of the packages are in Ubuntu packages, and some are released on the ROS buildfarm, which makes it worse.
Ooh, yeah. I remember taking some time a couple years ago to at least indicate which forks are old. Seems like house-cleaning may be in order again :P
And I'm not calling for the repos to merged / futzed around with.
Rather, just for their explicit purposes to be called out (via README.md and an issue_template.md) so people can know when to look at one vs. the other (or realize that one of the repositories is effectively a meta-package).
It's really confusing as a user (and sometimes contributor) to somehow have to gain / get tribal knowledge to know what's going on, when it's not that hard to document?
Yeah, can't agree more here. Took me sometime to figure out the relation between urdfdom and urdf
For what it is worth, @IanTheEngineer recently updated the documentation to more clearly show the relationship. It's available here: http://wiki.ros.org/urdf