Journals needing scripts
- Elsevier
- PNAS (...doesn't seem to have SIs other than PDFs, but check)
- Nature
- Frontiers in ...
- Cell (TREE et al.)
- ESA journals - not every one of them seems to use Archives
url <- paste0("http://www.pnas.org",.grep.url(paste0("http://www.pnas.org/lookup/doi/",doi), "(/content/)[0-9/]*"),".abstract")
could help with PNAS
Elsevier is officially unintelligible to me. I've no idea how the redirects are working, and I just can't do it :-(
- [ ] Elsevier
- [ ] PNAS
- [ ] Nature
- [ ] Frontiers in XXX
- [ ] Cell (TREE etc.)
- [ ] Cambridge dissertations and other misc. (see #10 )
...as well as, in no particular order...
-
[ ] Pensoft 28 journals all open access and on the same platform tech (ARPHA). Here's an example article from Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift with two suppdata files: https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.65.21000
a) https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.95.21000.suppl1 b) https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.95.21000.suppl2 -
[ ] Ubiquity Press ?? journals, all (?) open access and on the same platform tech. Here's an example article from Open Quaternary with one suppdata file: http://doi.org/10.5334/oq.32 a) https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.32.s1
-
[x] Copernicus Publications 40 journals, all open access and on the same platform tech. Here's an example article from Biogeosciences with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1739-2017 a) https://www.biogeosciences.net/14/1739/2017/bg-14-1739-2017-supplement.zip
-
[ ] Hindawi Over 250 open access journals all on the same platform tech. Here's an example article from International Journal of Ecology with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5620125 b) https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijecol/2017/5620125/#supplementary-material-1 ▶️ http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijecol/2017/5620125.f1.docx
-
[x] MDPI Over 190 open access journals on the same platform tech. Here's an example article from Molecules with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050681 a) http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/22/5/681#supplementary ▶️ http://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/22/5/681/s1
-
[ ] Cambridge University Press Over 380 journals on the same platform tech. Here's an example article from Oryx with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605315001246 a) https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/oryx/article/taking-the-elephant-out-of-the-room-and-into-the-corridor-can-urban-corridors-work/4C43E703569F63FEA771EB61D327F4F2#supplementary-materials ▶️
https://static.cambridge.org/resource/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170303101053109-0421:S0030605315001246:S0030605315001246sup001.pdf -
[ ] Taylor and Francis Online Loads of journals on the same platform. Here's an example article from Zoology and Ecology with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2017.1366293 a) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/suppl/10.1080/21658005.2017.1366293?scroll=top ▶️ https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5350366
-
[ ] BioOne Over 200 journals all on the same platform. Here's an example article from Journal of Parasitology with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.1645/17-15 a) http://www.bioone.org/doi/suppl/10.1645/17-15 ▶️ http://www.bioone.org/doi/suppl/10.1645/17-15/suppl_file/10.1645_17-15.s1.docx
-
[ ] SAGE Journals ~1,000 journals all on the same platform. Here's an example article from American Sociological Review with two suppdata files: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415621900 a) http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0003122415621900 ▶️ http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0003122415621900/suppl_file/england_online_supplement.pdf and http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0003122415621900/suppl_file/England_february_2016_media_abstracts.pdf
-
[ ] Royal Society of Chemistry Publishing Over 80 journals on the same platform. Here's an example article from Chemical Communications with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CC01172A a) http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/c8/cc/c8cc01172a/c8cc01172a1.pdf
-
[ ] Company of Biologists (the not open access journals & articles) This publisher is somewhat complicated. It has five journals. The two open access ones Disease Models & Mechanisms and Biology Open can have their supplementary data accessed via the existing EuropePMC method. But for the three closed access journals Development , Journal of Cell Science and Journal of Experimental Biology a specific per-publisher script is needed. Here's an example article from Development with one suppdata file: https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.160382 a) http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/dev.160382.supplemental ▶️ http://dev.biologists.org/highwire/filestream/1248938/field_highwire_adjunct_files/0/DEV160382supp.pdf ~~BMJ Journals, eLife, F1000Research, Wellcome Open Research, Gates Open Research~~ All covered via EuropePMC method
PS I would retitle the thread (is that possible on GH?) to 'publisher platforms needing scripts' as the problem is per platform tech, not per journal (thankfully!)
I see you've listed Cell Press as distinct from Elsevier? Why?
You can access the Cell Press imprint journals through the ScienceDirect platform, like other non-Cell Press Elsevier journals. Why implement two distinct methods when one would suffice? Suggest you merge the two as "Elsevier inc. Cell Press journals (ScienceDirect)" or some such notation.
May I add some to the list?
Are there any guidelines or step-by-step instructions for how to add a journal?
Update: Working on Copernicus Publications now!
PeerJ would be a great one to add, thanks!
The instructions are here: https://github.com/ropensci/suppdata/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md. If you need any help with it, please just ask (maybe make a separate issue or something). Thanks very much!
@willpearse can you check "Copernicus Publications" in the list in this post, please: https://github.com/ropensci/suppdata/issues/2#issuecomment-371476111
I think we need a nice list of already supported journals as well. I can't find one - am I just missing it? Happy to add one to the README file if I know it doesn't exist yet :-)
We don't have one right now - if you could add it somewhere sensible in the README I'd be very grateful indeed. Thank you!
List added with #33
Just wondering how to prioritize here... Maybe we should create bounties for publishers, and send an e-mail to each of them? :-) Or we as developers just vouch to add 1 source / month? That's one every quarter for three people @willpearse @sckott :-)
I imagine publishers won't help, and probably don't have any R people. I can put it on my list, but likely will be slower than 1 per month sadly
I don't think publishers will help either, sadly. I think the one per month thing is a good idea, Daniel: I think the best way to get more developers to help is to show that we're doing it ourselves. I'll do PenSoft by November 25th (unless you'd like it?).
No, go ahead. Just poke me when you're done, so I can pick up the next one.
@sckott My suggestion was only about once every three months :-)