ngraphql icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
ngraphql copied to clipboard

GraphQL .NET Server and Client

Results 10 ngraphql issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

May I know is there any example for subscription, even is integrated with other packages? Thanks.

Hi @rivantsov , When reading [this](https://graphql-rules.com/rules/mutation-payload-query), it suggests that for each mutation should have a dedicated payload, and the payload should return a field of Query type. I am wondering...

https://rivantsov.medium.com/ngraphql-a-new-framework-for-building-graphql-solutions-in-net-44a460d97e3c explaining design decisions, goals, and comparison with other solutions

https://medium.com/@rivantsov/post-factum-software-paradigms-agile-9566dd07db2b enjoy!

The latest release contains full implementation of Subscriptions, server and full support by GraphQLClient (Client in NGraphQL). Unit tests run successfully using this client. The question comes about other clients...

and other stuff, see Changelog.md for details

Bumps System.Text.Json from 8.0.3 to 8.0.4. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name=System.Text.Json&package-manager=nuget&previous-version=8.0.3&new-version=8.0.4)](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- Dependabot commands...

dependencies

Hi @rivantsov , I’m using NGraphQL.Client in a Blazor WebAssembly app and noticed that cookies are not being set or sent with GraphQL requests. After some investigation, it seems this...

Hi @rivantsov , I have the following error with the latest GraphiQL. I am not sure if this is a GraphiQL issue, or there is an incompatible schema within NGraphQL....

I have a table with few one to one fields. If we select a list of the table, we would expect those 1 to 1 fields will be smarly retrieved...