Allow to describe service account by `client_id` not just `id`

[ppatierno]

Hi all, when creating a service account I see that an id is assigned to it. What's the main purpose of it compared to the client_id got when the service account is created? I noticed that using rhoas service-account describe command it's possible to get information about a specific service account by searching by id not client_id (even if the client_id is then reported back in the JSON as part of such a command). I was wondering if it's simpler for the user to think in terms of client_id because it's returned as part of the service account creation. The only way I found to get the id is through the rhoas service-account list command. I think that allowing users to describe a service account providing client_id would make more sense and would be simpler to the user, unless I am missing something around the id meaning.

[wtrocki]

This is well known problem. Red hat sso is working on adding this feature to the api. we should have it in about month from now

[wtrocki]

@ziccardi is currently working on enabling API for it We can probably do some early integration and testing

[ziccardi]

@ziccardi is currently working on enabling API for it We can probably do some early integration and testing

Change has been implemented and merged today

[wtrocki]

Assigned to @rkpattnaik780 - I think new SDK/API no longer uses different ID for both so we could close that once confirmed

[rkpattnaik780]

I confirm that's the case. Will be fixed by #1716