Rafael Winterhalter
Rafael Winterhalter
You can add this dependency: https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/blob/master/byte-buddy-agent/pom.xml#L32 and on Linux, Byte Buddy will attempt a socket emulation. Otherwise, it is not possible unfortunately as of a missing binary in the JRE...
That is a good tip. I think J9 requires this.
Java 9+ casts return values to the generic type, maybe that is what is happening? Let me investigate a bit.
It seems like the method handle API does not like our handling of the `char[]` array with the varargs. I have to look how this is supposed to work with...
Fixed, it was as simple as dropping the varargs collector. If @TimvdLippe reviews it, we can get this out soon.
Fully agree with it but with (2). I think we should keep it as it can function well if the JVM is setup correctly. I am for example currently working...
Yes, that is what I wanted to suggest. Let's keep the mock makers in one artifact, but let us also have a smart default choice in case that no explicit...
Yeah, I think it's hard to estimate the actual impact before it's out so the longer we wait, the more Java 17 is adopted and the more big bang this...
You won't have to eat the performance hit because of Mockito, you can certainly pin the subclass mock maker, but the unsafe APIs are going to be deleted and with...
Yes, it's mentioned in the Mockito javadoc in greater detail.