bot icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
bot copied to clipboard

Make rules a slash command

Open shtlrs opened this issue 2 years ago • 6 comments

We have recently added keyword support for the rules command which enables people to invoke it more easily without having to remember what each number refers to.

This can be further simplified thanks to the autocomplete feature that comes with slash commands, and would then help people find the rule they intend in a more easier fashion.

shtlrs avatar Mar 10 '23 10:03 shtlrs

@shtlrs If this gets approved can I please implement it?

Ibrahim2750mi avatar Mar 10 '23 11:03 Ibrahim2750mi

Can slash commands suggest arbitrary text based on an integer and actually show the rule details in-line?

Also since the rules command is frequently used conversationally (with other messages appended afterwards) I'm not sure if this might hurt usability.

ionite34 avatar Mar 10 '23 11:03 ionite34

Can slash commands suggest arbitrary text based on an integer and actually show the rule details in-line?

Yeah the autocompleter can do something like that.

Ibrahim2750mi avatar Mar 10 '23 12:03 Ibrahim2750mi

Also since the rules command is frequently used conversationally (with other messages appended afterwards) I'm not sure if this might hurt usability.

Why would it hurt usability ?

shtlrs avatar Mar 10 '23 12:03 shtlrs

Also since the rules command is frequently used conversationally (with other messages appended afterwards) I'm not sure if this might hurt usability.

Why would it hurt usability ?

Screenshot_20230310-070623.png

Screenshot_20230310-070634.png

most use cases of rules either include a message after the command, and reply to some other user. Current state of slash commands seem to support neither. Making the rules an auto complete field will also make it easy to mistype the command on mobile where you need to click the field before it will register the auto complete, or else you just send the raw command in chat without interactions.

ionite34 avatar Mar 10 '23 12:03 ionite34

Humm, i'll have a look at the replying feature & see if there's a way to support that. As for the message after the rule, i personally have never used it like that, and when I do see it being used in that fashion, i tend to jump directly at the rule embed.

But you're right, it's a different scenario, and might not be what we want.

shtlrs avatar Mar 12 '23 10:03 shtlrs

I don't think there's a good workaround for the replying and including extra text issues, which is a dealbreaker for me.

wookie184 avatar May 23 '24 13:05 wookie184

Yes, i agree.

I'll close this for now

shtlrs avatar May 23 '24 13:05 shtlrs