proofrock
Pupcloud in docker will not show (in browser) content of files < 512b (bytes)
When trying to show a file in a browser that is smaller than 512 bytes, the content will not be shown.
I do not know if this is a pupcloud or docker limitation (i fear the last).
Could you fire up a quick install of filebrowser and see if that displays the file? Rules out Docker if so (if it worked).
I'd check for you but not by a machine to start moving stuff with ease.
On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 12:36, marioscube @.***> wrote:
When trying to show a file in a browser that is smaller than 512 bytes, the content will not be shown.
[image: Screenshot 2022-05-17 at 11 33 15] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20281601/168779771-d6d552cc-2ec3-4ea2-b0a1-8eb57fd1d2ae.png 511b.txt https://github.com/proofrock/pupcloud/files/8707079/511b.txt 512b.txt https://github.com/proofrock/pupcloud/files/8707081/512b.txt
I do not know if this is a pupcloud or docker limitation (i fear the last).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/proofrock/pupcloud/issues/49, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABV5MAEPENHIXWGXBZLFPY3VKNSATANCNFSM5WEI3H5A . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Installed filebrowser in docker.......... Not very logical installation.
In filebrowser I can "view" the 511b file. However I have the impression that filebrowser does NOT work the same as pupcloud.
I cannot rule out Docker.
The file is there, but the mime type resolution fails. I use the internal Golang routines, that already gave proof not to be the most reliable of all (I even wrote it in the README). In our case, I suspect it offloads resolution to the operating system, that of course inside Docker is a different one (Alpine Linux) and may fail. It's strange that it happens only for <512bytes... anyway. Two possible solutions:
- revert to mime type resolution only based on file extension
- adopt a "more regular" linux distro for the docker image, but this would make for a huge image
...I have to re-check the go routines, however; I'll open a ticket in Go's language issue tracker to get more details.
Dunno. It seemed ok here.
Taken from an old file with commented out options
filebrowser5:
container_name: filebrowser5
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "2053:80"
volumes:
- /home/capture-au/folder1:/srv
- /home/capture-au/filebrowser-config/filebrowser5.db:/database.db
- /home/capture-au/filebrowser-config/filebrowser.json:/.filebrowser.json
- /etc/letsencrypt/live/a1.blackjackanderson.download/fullchain.pem:/fullchain.pem
- /etc/letsencrypt/live/a1.blackjackanderson.download/privkey.pem:/privkey.pem
image: filebrowser/filebrowser
Can't say about underlying system differences. —- Via iPad. Hopefully with not too many typos.
On 17. May 2022, at 14.46, marioscube @.***> wrote:
Installed filebrowser in docker.......... Not very logical installation.
In filebrowser I can "view" the 511b file. However I have the impression that filebrowser does NOT work the same as pupcloud.
I cannot rule out Docker.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.
Yes, think our messages crossed. I don't pretend to know what fb is written in.
—- Via iPad. Hopefully with not too many typos.
On 17. May 2022, at 14.53, Germano Rizzo @.***> wrote:
Can't say about underlying system differences.
See my explanation above
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.