kitti_eval
kitti_eval copied to clipboard
prclibo
How can I solve this problem? Thank you for participating in our evaluation! Loading detections... number of files for evaluation: 3769 ERROR: Couldn't read: 003323.txt of ground truth. Please write...
The plot folder is generated, but it is empty，and number of files for evaluation: 0 why???
```preds_val/plot/car_detection.txt car_detection AP: 0.417685 0.280079 0.230861 PDFCROP 1.38, 2012/11/02 - Copyright (c) 2002-2012 by Heiko Oberdiek. ==> 1 page written on `car_detection.pdf'. save preds_val/plot/car_orientation.txt car_orientation AP: 0.195098 0.127194 0.103741 PDFCROP...
car_detection_AP : 35.000000 79.857147 84.663734 sh: 1: gnuplot: not found sh: 1: gnuplot: not found Error: /undefinedfilename in (car_detection_AP.eps) Operand stack: Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push...
Hello, I see the following: car_detection_ground AP: 63.954884 73.779037 74.295746 As I understand, the scores are ordered as easy, moderate, hard. If this this correct then is there something wrong...
Thank you for participating in our evaluation! mkdir: cannot create directory ‘../../eval_kitti/results/exp1/data12/plot’: File exists Loading detections... number of files for evaluation: 0 why 0?
When I give the ground truths with some score directly as results but always get 90.90 as the APs. Does anyone achieve AP of 100?
I would expect similar values for both cases, but I do not get similar values. Is there any difference between these two?
Do the detections get filtered based on the size of 2D box or dimensions of the detected object?
Hi, I would expect the 2D AP to be somewhat close to the value I get when I evaluate it with COCO evaluation script. Kitti 2D (iou=0.5) AP: 35.7 COCO...