powenn
AUR Support
I've made this package, seems to work on my machine using debtap (I know, lazy). Try it out, let me know if it works for you as well
olivertzeng@pearOS-machine ~ % yay -Syu [sudo] password for olivertzeng: :: Synchronizing package databases... main is up to date core is up to date extra 1716.6 KiB 611 KiB/s 00:03 [################################] 100% community-testing 26.4 KiB 25.6 KiB/s 00:01 [################################] 100% community 6.7 MiB 2048 KiB/s 00:03 [################################] 100% multilib-testing 4.4 KiB 21.1 KiB/s 00:00 [################################] 100% multilib 169.6 KiB 150 KiB/s 00:01 [################################] 100% alg_repo is up to date :: Starting full system upgrade... there is nothing to do :: Searching databases for updates... :: Searching AUR for updates... -> Orphaned AUR Packages: ipwndfu-linushenze-git -> Flagged Out Of Date AUR Packages: altserver-bin there is nothing to do olivertzeng@pearOS-machine ~ %
There is so much things to do and each of them have things need to be consider and think about ,It will take so much time , ,Every time I programming on it ,I have to open ubuntu VM and while done ,I have to switch to others VMs for testing ,So I always developing it with bad performance then highly CPU usage heating up my laptop and I have my own stuff to do ,So I couldn't take much time on it
- Fully rewrite the whole project
Place AltServer and netmuxd to others place ,So they could be update separately with reading version info so do the GUI program itself
Simplify the original codes , there are several parts could be improved like the MessageBox parts
- Add netmuxd support
It's not much hard for Wifi refreshing, the shell script edition already support it,*BUT IT'S HARD TO DO WIFI INSTALLATION*,To do wifi installation, we have to storage all paired devices name and theirs UDID,and showing available devices in menu action just like original AltServer
- Others package support ?
I won't consider it until questions above got solved,To support others package, we might have to prepare virtual environments and might also need to modify the original packaging method
So What Could you do
Currently ,for the best solution is using Shell Script edition instead , it's much easier to maintain and has less cross distributions issues ,
NOTE
I haven't give up it , I just needs time to do a huge update as I mentioned
And whats for that "Some" reasons, because you dont use arch btw?
I also have arch-based linux VMs , they are for testing , So yes I am not using linux for daily OS , but it's not meaning I "don't" use arch