How could one plot rtb.models.DH.plot and spatialmath.base.trplot() in the same figure?
For the inverse kinematics portion, in matlab it was easy to plot both the robot's current configuration as well as the desired pose configuration.
I have not found a way to fix the figure upon which both of these methods plot...
Pls send a minimal example that shows the problem.
# Imports
from spatialmath import *
from spatialmath.base import *
from roboticstoolbox import *
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Puma
puma = rtb.models.DH.Puma560()
# Start at qn and plot
puma.plot(puma.qn)
# Desired pose and plot
T = SE3(0.6, 0.1, 0.5)*SE3().RPY([0, 0, 0], unit='deg')
trplot(T.A, dims=[-2,2], frame='EE', rviz=True) # plots not superposed here.
Plots not easily superposed here... can use plt.ion(), but I notice that when the coordinates are loaded, the robot shrinks.
Continue to display the robot solution:
# Desired angles... analytic/numerical solns
sol = puma.ikine_LM(T, q0=puma.qn)
puma.plot(sol.q);
New figure opens up. We are not able to see a nice overlap of the solution with the desired pose as is.
I get this
The axes are a bit big, but otherwise OK.
Maybe do
puma.plot(puma.qn, block=False)
So that you don’t have to dismiss the Puma plot before doing the next plot.
At the moment, by default all RTB plots are blocking, but I’m not sure now that’s such a great idea. Let me know how it goes.
Peter
On 22 Feb 2021, at 7:39 pm, Dr. Juan Rojas [email protected] wrote:
Imports
import math import numpy as np
from spatialmath import * from spatialmath.base import *
import roboticstoolbox as rtb from roboticstoolbox import *
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
Puma
puma = rtb.models.DH.Puma560()
Start at qn and plot
puma.plot(puma.qn)
Desired pose and plot
T = SE3(0.6, 0.1, 0.5)*SE3().RPY([0, 0, 0], unit='deg') trplot(T.A, dims=[-2,2], frame='EE', rviz=True) # plots not superposed here.
Desired angles... analytic/numerical solns
sol = puma.ikine_LM(T, q0=puma.qn) puma.plot(sol.q); # Would like to see the robot des pose to be superposed over the trplot frame version. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/petercorke/robotics-toolbox-python/issues/173#issuecomment-783238791, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC2BIURSHB76KHCUIQODAMLTAIQ4DANCNFSM4XNCZQ2A.
Thank you.
The block=False, works nicely for the first part, however, the second puma.plot resets the figure and overwrites it... It would be nice to use the same figure/axes there. Perhaps have an option to set which fig/axes to use.