Document list of legally restricted codes
Deploying opensafely-docs with
Cloudflare Pages
| Latest commit: |
8009da9
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://f85c23e9.opensafely-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://lucyb-restricted-codes.opensafely-docs.pages.dev |
Thanks Lucy!
- I think it's easier for readers to spot the key terms that they might need to know about if we start each point with a brief description in bold rather than the code e.g.:
- Gender related issues: SNOMED Refset for General Practice summary data sharing exclusion for gender related issues 999004351000000109
- Also it will be most helpful if we can provide links to the codes which are contained within each codelist. The browser links expire after a time I think. Can we create them all in OpenCodelists? I made one here
@HelenCEBM thanks for the review. I've updated the formatting as you suggested. Can you check that looks okay now, please?
I agree that linking to the codes, using codelists in OpenCodelists, would be good. Is that something you/your team could pick up?
Just picking up a review of this. Technically the term 'legally restricted codes' refers to restrictions to certain ICD-10, OPCS and SNOMED-ECDS codes which should not be included in SUS datasets.
The codes which are excluded in our primary care data are excluded due to RCGP 'sensitive datasets' restrictions - link here. I think it might make sense to update the wording, and possibly include a link.
My only other comment is that the links to opencodelists don't seem to have come through @lucyb
My only other comment is that the links to opencodelists don't seem to have come through @lucyb
@rose-higgins no one has created these yet (I have one but not all 4). If you'd like to pick that up that would be fab, otherwise it's somewhere on my list...
My only other comment is that the links to opencodelists don't seem to have come through @lucyb
@rose-higgins no one has created these yet (I have one but not all 4). If you'd like to pick that up that would be fab, otherwise it's somewhere on my list...
your absolutely right sorry i misread!
Just picking up a review of this. Technically the term 'legally restricted codes' refers to restrictions to certain ICD-10, OPCS and SNOMED-ECDS codes which should not be included in SUS datasets.
The codes which are excluded in our primary care data are excluded due to RCGP 'sensitive datasets' restrictions - link here. I think it might make sense to update the wording, and possibly include a link.
Thanks Rose. I've changed the title and wording, please let me know what you think?
I'm unsure about including the link, since it refers to the Summary Care Record and I'm concerned that it might be misleading. That said, if you're confident that it will be more meaningful to researchers (it's not an area I know that much about), then I can include a direct link to the relevant section.