openconfig
OTG Test - RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart
OTG Test conversion of RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart Resolves #580 The ACL sections were replaced by the "Initiate graceful restart" in the case of DUT helper and "gnoi restart pid" in case of DUT restart initiator
Pull Request Functional Test Report for #1509 / 9c12968346fd82be732ef343203dc75eb958cd9e
Virtual Devices
| Device | Test | Test Documentation | Job | Raw Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arista cEOS |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
||
| Cisco 8000E |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
||
| Cisco XRd |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
||
| Juniper ncPTX |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
||
| Nokia SR Linux |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
||
| Openconfig Lemming |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
Hardware Devices
| Device | Test | Test Documentation | Raw Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arista 7808 |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
|
| Cisco 8808 |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
|
| Juniper PTX10008 |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
|
| Nokia 7250 IXR-10e |  |
RT-1.4: BGP Graceful Restart |
Note that the readme was updated in #1791
The PR still includes the previous readme version
Note that the readme was updated in #1791
The PR still includes the previous readme version
Indeed. However with the new README, who should consider breaking up the test. @jasdeep-hundal what do you think?
Ask is to dev https://github.com/openconfig/featureprofiles/pull/1791. Why the deviation?
https://github.com/openconfig/featureprofiles/issues/2507 is also assigned to keysight. Is keysight saying they will not help dev of pull/1791?
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11459210876
Details
- 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
- No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
- Overall coverage remained the same at 55.268%
| Totals | |
|---|---|
| Change from base Build 11453300163: | 0.0% |
| Covered Lines: | 1983 |
| Relevant Lines: | 3588 |
💛 - Coveralls
@sachendras could you please review the corrections I've made to the README file. I'm assuming we would want to run 1.4.5 for both IBGP and EBGP. Also for tests 1.4.7 through 1.4.10 when testing EBGP I'm assuming the direction of traffic is ATE port2 - ATE Port1 (EBGP routes). In this case the notification will be sent from DUT port1