why not write it using `nn.Linear`?

[crazydogen]

Here is a simple version.

import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class Time2vec(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self, c_in, c_out, activation="cos"):
        super().__init__()
        self.wnbn = nn.Linear(c_in, c_out - 1, bias=True)
        self.w0b0 = nn.Linear(c_in, 1, bias=True)
        self.act = torch.cos if activation == "cos" else torch.sin

    def forward(self, x):
        part0 = self.act(self.w0b0(x))
        # print(part0.shape)
        part1 = self.act(self.wnbn(x))
        # print(part1.shape)
        return torch.cat([part0, part1], -1)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_x = torch.randn((1, 3, 3000))  # [N, C, L] -> batch, channel, length
    m = Time2vec(3, 10)
    out = m(test_x.permute(0,2,1))
    print(out.shape)

[schuemie]

(Sorry for responding in someone else's repo)

Seems reasonable, but note that the sin (or cos) is only applied to part1, not part0 (see here or equation (1) in the paper).