nsiccha
nsiccha
The aim would be to also expose the changes in #473 when addressing this issue.
This would be very nice! Then I could (more easily) do something else while some long(ish) running computation is happening in the "main" REPL. 🚀
Thanks! Yes, I was a bit unsure where exactly this belonged :)
For me, this would also only make it easier for me to implement the workaround for the other bugs. When these are fixed, then my "need" for this feature would...
Oh, I accidentally closed this issue, and I'm not allowed to reopen it. Would you do that, @WardBrian ?:)
Thanks! Sorry, I must have used some hot key which I wasn't aware of 😅
I do wonder about numerical stability though. Obviously, "you should never actually compute the inverse of a matrix", but we do. If we do that anyways, we may as well...