Nico Rehwaldt

Results 1482 comments of Nico Rehwaldt

Not right now. This is related to https://github.com/camunda/camunda-modeler/issues/177 though. Mid-term, we'd like to provide these kind of actions as refactoring actions on the BPMN editor.

Adding this to the overall _refactoring support_ basket. I'd love to see these kind of things being supported by the modeler out of the box, i.e. accessible via the menu...

Will be solved via [create/append anything](https://github.com/bpmn-io/bpmn-js/issues/1627): ![capture qpon4Z_optimized](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/58601/168652212-b11fae4e-e138-4537-90fc-ecdee629cf23.gif)

Even more so as the basics will be fully keyboard accessible (`n` / `a`) to create/append anything in the future. I think as this is an expert feature, hiding it...

Agreed with @andreasgeier. We can implement this easily if we find an elegant pattern that fits into the existing usage behavior. It is a classic "configurable power tool" feature.

Split up validation into separate topic: https://github.com/camunda/camunda-modeler/issues/3084. That one goes beyond duration but shall cover different mentions of times, durations and intervals, as well as CRON expressions across our app(s).

Agree. May indicate a deeper issue with the integration though.

My quick feedback: I'd go for a safe, robust default behavior and not consider the alternatives. Comparing different diagrams it is of limited use if properties panel layout is a...

In this case (https://github.com/camunda/camunda-modeler/issues/2883#issuecomment-1086931382), please re-consider your feedback @andreasgeier. Individual tab menues as @Skaiir mentioned (https://github.com/camunda/camunda-modeler/issues/2883#issuecomment-1086620080) provide the "tab context", the `...` menu does not. I think there is room...