Mike Shriver

@lhellebr can you provide more specific context around when you encountered this error? What was the specific traceback? What modifications had you made to robottelo.properties, or the constants (if any)?...

Please remove the merge commit

please remove the merge commit

@hkx303 I don't see existing test coverage for the three items listed here. Can you provide your thoughts on whether coverage should exist in robottelo for the listed scenarios? You...

@pondrejk has this test coverage been addressed yet? I see some references to it, but I don't think there is full coverage.

This issue can be used more broadly to audit for uses of static sleep and to apply the coding best practice of using wait_for to all test modules, not just...

https://github.com/SatelliteQE/robottelo/blob/0708b43db125eb6dbdc6e99e31f11ae670034441/tests/foreman/cli/test_capsule.py#L181 We have a test case for this against a capsule proxy, but not with a 'real capsule'. The component is currently owned by @vsedmik, who I'm assigning. @pondrejk please...

@latran concerning RP/ibutsu, they accept all metadata key/value pairs defined by markers/user_properties. See this module for how those markers/metadata are processed and injected into user_properties for junit: https://github.com/SatelliteQE/robottelo/blob/master/pytest_plugins/metadata_markers.py Concerning polarion/testimony,...

I've engaged with the UXD team (@Ron-Lavi) and @latran about this PF4 confirmation dialog (which is actually a modal). This should be addressed not individually on entity views, but within...

Following discussion with UX, they're not going to be able to 'spoof' the browser alert for the new confirmation dialog modals. This means we need to address this by implementing...