webbpsf icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
webbpsf copied to clipboard

James Webb Space Telescope PSF simulation tool - NOTE THIS VERSION OF REPO IS SUPERCEDED BY spacetelescope/webbpsf

Results 14 webbpsf issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

I'm getting a different FWHM result when comparing the output from webbpsf.display_profiles and webbpsf.measure_fwhm (0.228" vs 0.189"). I haven't looked at the code yet but just wanted to document this...

In checking out the distortion results in v0.7.0, I noticed resulting PSFs getting shifted in ways I was not expecting. These shifts depend on values specified in `detector_position` attribute. For...

- [x] Copy the code - [ ] Copy the open issues and PRs - [ ] Update URL links in docs, etc. - [ ] Update URL links in...

Could use some modernization. - [ ] Cleanup and organize better the example codes - [ ] Switch to STScI-template documentation theme? - [ ] Similar for POPPY also.

Details TBD, in coordination with the NIRSpec team.

Details TBD, in coordination with the MIRI team.

@AndreaBellini would like us to improve the documentation on obtaining supersampled PSFs. Here's the current section: http://pythonhosted.org/webbpsf/webbpsf.html#pixel-scales-sampling-and-oversampling I understand that Andrea wanted a PSF sampled at a different pixel scale...

docs

The docs suggest it does, but actually this doesn't work like it should: ```python In [3]:nc = webbpsf.NIRCam() In [4]: nc.detector = 'NRCA5' In [5]: nc.pixelscale Out[5]: 0.0311 # UNEXPECTED...

When displaying the exit pupil orientation of the OTE, the segments are currently labelled with their labels from the entrance pupil orientation.

Either find WFE maps from the IPR LEDs, or generate from Zemax. This should hopefully include wavelength-dependent terms for the NIRCam-internal WFE (from the refractive optics being used at large...