microsoft
Precompiled binaries
Are there any plans to release precompiled and signed binaries to simplify the process of hosting a standalone Garnet based cache?
I'll add that I can't find any official docker files for use on docker hub ☹
The Dockerfile variants are in the root folder of the repo here: https://github.com/microsoft/garnet. We are not yet hosting containers ourselves, but for now anyone in the community can host it. More details: https://microsoft.github.io/garnet/docs/welcome/releases#docker
@talw-nym I've built and tested a signed Linux amd/arm image here: ghcr.io/pl4nty/garnet@sha256:07247278d5bd716063687feaf340f5271dbc41875835dc53fb552031311944b9
I'll work on Windows tonight, since WCOW BuildKit support recently released
I built an image and pushed it to docker hub, which can be used directly. @talw-nym :v:
https://hub.docker.com/r/yzy613/garnet
Here is a docker-free console application: lc6464/GarnetServer 😊
I compiled binaries for win-x64 win-arm64 linux-x64 linux-arm64 osx-arm64 and osx-x64 ❤️
@badrishc I hit a known issue with nested folders so couldn't compile natively on Windows, but I was able to cross-compile with some refactoring. It can be much faster in some build topologies like local builds, and allows exotic architectures like s390x (IBM z). This image has Linux amd/arm and Windows Nano Server: ghcr.io/pl4nty/garnet@sha256:3f48d012023ca4eb28f5cd14867d747e49f4e9037e279de696726c7cc133b3eb
I'm happy to send a PR, but I used prerelease Dockerfile syntax so it might not be ready to merge yet.
Here is a docker-free console application: lc6464/GarnetServer 😊 I compiled binaries for
win-x64win-arm64linux-x64linux-arm64osx-arm64andosx-x64❤️
Just a question - how does your wrapper differ from the console application we have here: https://github.com/microsoft/garnet/tree/main/main/GarnetServer
Just a question - how does your wrapper differ from the console application we have here: https://github.com/microsoft/garnet/tree/main/main/GarnetServer
Obviously, no difference. I only published some binaries. 🥰
An official dockerhub image would be very desirable for this. Almost every place where I can think of using this would require deployment via docker. And a few of those places would consider it a supply chain vulnerability to use an image provided by an unverified 3rd party.
Makes adoption much easier.
Hi, I want to try out the Garnet but I am stuck by not getting precompiled RPM file for Enterprise Linux 9? Please make them available soon!
Added a PR to add official multi-arch docker images: https://github.com/microsoft/garnet/pull/107
I don't use docker, I just need direct installation rpm file
You can use latest release of my repo https://github.com/lc6464/GarnetServer
I don't use docker, I just need direct installation rpm file
You can use latest release of my repo https://github.com/lc6464/GarnetServer
There is no "rpm" file to install in your repo? I am not a programmer to compile or build! Kindly
There is no "rpm" file to install in your repo? I am not a programmer to compile or build! Kindly
No, you can use wget to download linux-x64-based.tar.xz .
Download and where to put these three files to run Garner Server?
- libnative_device.so
- GarnetServer.pdb
- GarnetServer
Download and where to put these three files to run Garner Server?
- libnative_device.so
- GarnetServer.pdb
- GarnetServer
You can put anywhere you want, and execute ./GarnetServer in that directory.
But you should ensure dotnet has been installed.
We now have container packages here: https://github.com/microsoft/garnet/pkgs/container/garnet Any future containers will be put in this place too but what we put here is TBD. As for putting out containers in Docker Hub or Microsoft Artifact Registry is also TBD.
