Figure out versioning strategy for vNext
Split from #19106
Details are in RFC #19658 but will be extracted into its own RFC for a long running discussion on how to version vNext packages.
- Independent versioning strategy
- Lockstep (full vs major lockstep)
Because this issue has not had activity for over 150 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.
Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.
We have now #23914 that covers it. Should be this closed?
I don't think this is the same actually, we still don't really know how we are going to do our first breaking change
I don't think this is the same actually, we still don't really know how we are going to do our first breaking change
IMO this issue should be named differently. if i understood it correctly we need a strategy how will we approach v10 per say.
regarding v9 as @layershifter mentioned we have #23914 .
WDYT @ling1726 ?
@Hotell is it incorrectly named ? this isn't about release but about versioning.
Because this issue has not had activity for over 150 days, we're automatically closing it for house-keeping purposes.
Still require assistance? Please, create a new issue with up-to date details.