Feature Request/Question: Create `List<T>` instead of `class` for elements with a single sequence.

[las-nsc]

Forgive me if this is already possible somehow, but when there is an element/class with only a single sequence within it, could it just use a List<T> where the name of the variable is the name of the element? This would solve several cases where the collection name should be plural too.

<Foo>
  <Bars>
    <Bar/>
    <Bar/>
    <Bar/>
  <Bars>
</Foo>

currently makes:

public class Foo {
  public Bars Bars { get; } = new();
}

public class Bars {
  public List<Bar> Bar { get; } = new();
}

public class Bar { }

// Access
Foo foo = new();
foreach (var bar in foo.Bars.Bar) { }

But could be:

public class Foo {
  public List<Bar> Bars { get; } = new();
}

public class Bar { }

// Access
Foo foo = new();
foreach (var bar in foo.Bars) { }

Maybe this is already possible, either with a flag or by changing the XSD somehow, or maybe it wouldn't work with the XmlSerializer, but it seems like it should be this way.

[mganss]

This should be possible by using the --useArrayItemAttribute option which is true by default. If this doesn't work for you, can you share an example xsd?