Max Suica
Max Suica
@ulaladungdung, @methylDragon, see my feature branch for fresh STL and STEP files: https://github.com/maxsu/StanfordDoggoProject/tree/feature/track-CAD-Files/DoggoHardware/3D%20Printed These include all 3d printed parts in project. I've generated them directly from the fusion 360 model,...
Notes: 1. Most files are named in accordance to their part names in the CAD model, which (currently) disagree somewhat with the BOM. Hopefully this does not cause too much...
See the [updated stl](https://github.com/maxsu/StanfordDoggoProject/blob/5ca2fe981353bd918723352c2b82fe12936ca445/DoggoHardware/3D%20Printed/StanfordDoggoOuterBigPulley.stl). Fusion version is [here](https://a360.co/31twOWO). Be careful; I increased the minimum wall thickness by 15% (to 1.15mm), but the insert's centerline could drift during heated installation. Let...
I reduced the height of the pulley's shoulder boss by 0.5 mm in order to accommodate the larger diameter of the A333 without altering any other parts. However, the spacing...
Next steps: 1. Agree on a primary file format and circuit design software (eg. .SCH + KiCad, Autodesk Eagle, etc.) 2. Add part IDs to the electronic parts in the...
Thanks for the update - the assembly looks good now. The "Access Denied" issue persists. It was first mentioned in #31, where @mseedman had trouble with the Leg Linkage file....
I've made a [post](https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-support/stanford-doggo-public-link-upload-issue/td-p/9000575) on the fusion 360 forums - the community may shed some light on the upload issue. I've also found a temporary workaround. cc: @mseedman - you...
Good news! Autodesk support team has provided a provisional fix for the "access denied issue" (see [this thread](https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-support/stanford-doggo-public-link-upload-issue/m-p/9006809/highlight/true#M65178)). The `f3z` file contained in Jeff.Strather's `Full Doggo Assembly_Repaired.zip` loads without causing...
I've checked all four sets of inner and outer pulleys in the v1.0 doggo hardware model (https://a360.co/2OBxTbH), and they look correct:   This looks like it is internal revision...
I'd love to help revise the bom / make it more accessible. I'm working in Rhino. Ideas/suggestions are welcome! Ps: Also not from doggo project team